<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>二次量子化 on Haifei's Home</title><link>https://haifei-home.pages.dev/tags/%E4%BA%8C%E6%AC%A1%E9%87%8F%E5%AD%90%E5%8C%96/</link><description>Recent content in 二次量子化 on Haifei's Home</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>zh-CN</language><managingEditor>hfwang132@gmail.com (hfwang132)</managingEditor><webMaster>hfwang132@gmail.com (hfwang132)</webMaster><copyright>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.</copyright><lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2025 14:16:03 +0800</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://haifei-home.pages.dev/tags/%E4%BA%8C%E6%AC%A1%E9%87%8F%E5%AD%90%E5%8C%96/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>当我们做二次量子化的时候，我们究竟在做什么？</title><link>https://haifei-home.pages.dev/post_20250809_%E5%BD%93%E6%88%91%E4%BB%AC%E5%81%9A%E4%BA%8C%E6%AC%A1%E9%87%8F%E5%AD%90%E5%8C%96%E7%9A%84%E6%97%B6%E5%80%99-%E6%88%91%E4%BB%AC%E7%A9%B6%E7%AB%9F%E5%9C%A8%E5%81%9A%E4%BB%80%E4%B9%88/</link><pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2025 14:16:03 +0800</pubDate><author>hfwang132@gmail.com (hfwang132)</author><guid>https://haifei-home.pages.dev/post_20250809_%E5%BD%93%E6%88%91%E4%BB%AC%E5%81%9A%E4%BA%8C%E6%AC%A1%E9%87%8F%E5%AD%90%E5%8C%96%E7%9A%84%E6%97%B6%E5%80%99-%E6%88%91%E4%BB%AC%E7%A9%B6%E7%AB%9F%E5%9C%A8%E5%81%9A%E4%BB%80%E4%B9%88/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;一次量子化无法描述粒子数的叠加态，更无法描述粒子数变化情况下的动力学&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;一次量子化和二次量子化的说法很容易让人以为它们是等价的，哪个方便就用哪个，就像薛定谔和海森堡表象一样。实则不然。二次量子化的描述能力是严格强于一次量子化的。一次量子化只是二次量子化在粒子数固定情形下的简化描述，本身是有缺陷的。&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>